Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore’s Guidance to State Probate Judges

In his capacity as administrative head of the state judicial system, Alabama chief justice Roy Moore has sent a memo to state probate judges advising them that the federal-district court rulings against Alabama’s marriage laws “do not require you to issue marriage licenses that are illegal under Alabama law.”

Given my previous discussions of the question whether state officials are always obligated to comply with federal-court orders, I should emphasize that the position taken by Moore at this time is far more modest than the robust assertions of state authority that I suggested may well be defensible. In particular, Moore sets forth two propositions, both of which seem well grounded:

1. Moore first argues (pp. 4-9) that state probate judges are not bound by the federal-court orders. By their terms, the orders apply to the state attorney general “and all his officers, agents, servants, and employees, and others in active concert or participation with any of them.” But, Moore explains, state probate judges, in addition to not being parties to either case, are “members of the judicial branch of government” and are thus not officers, agents, servants, or employees of the attorney general. Nor are they in active concert or participation with the attorney general (or with his officers, etc.)

2. Moore next explains (pp. 9-13) that state probate judges need not give precedential effect to the federal-court rulings, as it is widely recognized that state judges are not bound to follow lower federal-court decisions on federal constitutional questions.

As I read it, nothing in Moore’s reasoning would be altered if the Supreme Court denies Alabama’s pending request for a stay of the federal court’s orders. 

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Religion

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More