Alito’s Alleged “Concessions”

Ramesh — I am not troubled by Ethan Leib’s article on Judge Alito’s alleged “concessions,” but I am puzzled by it. Leib says it is a “concession” that Alito embraced Justice Jackson’s concurrence in the Youngstown Steel case, but that opinion is the prevailing law of the land on such questions. In Dames & Moore v. Regan, the Supreme Court (in an opinion by Chief Justice Rehnquist) adopted Jackson’s opinion as the controlling approach to evaluating contested exercises of executive power. The surprise would have been if Alito, or any prospective Justice, did not have positive things to say about Jackson’s opinion, as it would suggest an unfamiliarity with some of the bedrock principles of separation of powers. It’s also not a concession to say that the Supreme Court should look at foreign law in some cases to interpret treaties to which the U.S. is a party. Insofar as a treaty is an agreement between multiple parties, looking at how the various parties understand the nature of their commitments is one way to resolve any ambiguities in the treaty’s text. This is not a controversial claim either, and hardly a concession.

[As a side note: Leib is also a bit off base when he suggests that treaties are not enforced as rigorously in the United States as they are abroad. To the contrary, validly ratified treaties are part of the supreme law of the land under the Constitution. This is not the case in many other countries. This is one of the reasons conservatives takes treaties so seriously, and view them with suspicion. In many other countries, however, treaties do not have the same legal status, and thus are less binding on the governments that adopt them. In the environmental area, for example, the United States is one of the few nations that fulfills its treaty commitments, whereas many other nations ratify treaties and then continue to flout their requirements.]

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular


My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More