The Argument for Obstruction

Al Meyerhoff, formerly of the Natural Resources Defense Council and now a trial attorney at the notorious  firm of Lerach Coughlin Stoia, makes the case for Democratic obstruction of Bush’s remaining appellate nominees in the Legal Times.  There’s not much to Meyerhoff’s argument beyond “they did it too,” and complaints that a majority of sitting federal judges were nominated by Republicans.  (Well, what do you expect when there have been Republican Presidents making nominations for 20 of the last 32 years?)

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular


Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More