Aron-neous Ethics

In an op-ed in today’s Washington Post, in support of a call for an ethics code for Supreme Court justices, Nan Aron of the Alliance for Justice takes some more cheap whacks at Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas for supposedly “appearing at political strategy conferences hosted by the conservative Koch brothers.”

As I have pointed out, according to the Supreme Court spokeswoman’s account (at the end of this article), Scalia spoke about international law at a Federalist Society dinner sponsored by Charles and Elizabeth Koch in January 2007 “and did not attend the separate political and strategy meeting hosted by the Kochs.” Thomas spoke about his autobiography at a similar Federalist Society dinner sponsored by Charles and Elizabeth Koch in January 2008. Thomas then made “a brief drop-by” at “one of the separate Koch meeting sessions” but “was not a participant.”

Rather than acknowledging and disputing the Supreme Court spokeswoman’s account, Aron simply hides it from her readers and distorts the facts to serve her purposes. Moreover, she relies on Koch materials describing their January 2010 meeting as the sole basis for her conclusion that the January 2007 meeting (which Scalia did not attend) and the January 2008 meeting (at which Thomas made only a “brief drop-by”)  were “transparently political.”

For what it’s worth, Aron is also wrong to state that the Supreme Court “is not subject to mandatory ethics requirements.” The justices are, for example, subject to the disqualification rules of 28 U.S.C. § 455.

Further, whatever the merits of having the Code of Conduct for United States Judges formally apply to Supreme Court justices—I’ve formed no opinion on that question—Aron is fooling herself and her readers if she believes that the vague standards (e.g., “avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety”) and undefined or ill-defined terms (e.g., “political activity”) in the Code of Conduct would somehow provide much clearer guidance as to what actions are permissible or impermissible. (Indeed, Aron herself states that the Code of Conduct “doesn’t frown on ideological activity but does prohibit political activity.”)

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More