The CFPB’s True Debilitating Uncertainty

Two journalists in the Wall Street Journal yesterday floated the “uncertainty” argument in favor of the CFPB; in advance of this piece, that argument hadbeen made by the CFPB’s own former senior counsel for enforcement strategy when reacting to last week’s court decision that struck down President Obama’s attempt to appoint federal officers without the Senate’s constitutionally required advice and consent. As the press and many others have noted, this decision casts a grave shadow of doubt upon the constitutionality of Richard Cordray’s own installation as CFPB director without Senate confirmation.

The suggestion that the banking community would suffer greater uncertainty from CFPB Director Cordray’s removal from office than from his continued unconstitutional exercise of the CFPB’s broad, unchecked power strains credibility. 

To apply the same rule of law to Cordray’s unconstitutional appointment that the D.C. Circuit applied to the improperly appointed NLRB directors — to remove him and require the president to secure Senate approval of his next nomination — poses no threat of harmful “uncertainty” to banks. The truly debilitating uncertainty that confronts banks, especially Main Street community banks, is the uncertainty inherent in Dodd-Frank itself. Dodd-Frank disrupted the longstanding structure of federal and state regulation of community banks and other small lenders and replaced it with the CFPB, an unprecedented agency that enjoys open-ended grants of power and which is largely immune to oversight by the president and Congress.

The uncertainty we should be worried about doesn’t come from requiring the president to follow the Constitution’s plain rules; rather, it’s produced by giving the CFPB director, a single unelected regulator, limitless power and no oversight. It is that generous helping of power that led the CFPB director to testify before the House Oversight Committee that it is “probably not useful to try to define” financial regulations in advance, and that instead he would define much law after the fact, on a case-by-case basis. That expansive power similarly emboldened Cordray to testify before the Senate Banking Committee that he believes that even as an unelected regulator he has “exception authority” empowering him to “waive” the requirements of other federal laws passed by Congresses and signed by presidents.

In short, the real, dangerous uncertainty is found in the unconstitutional appointment of a regulator who claims the power to write laws on an after-the-fact, case-by-case basis, and to nullify laws already on the books.

If the president actually cared about the specter of “uncertainty” that his surrogates now invoke, then he never would have appointed Director Cordray in clear violation of the Constitution, inviting lawsuits to restore the document’s rule of law. If, last year, the CFPB was actually concerned about this newly alleged “uncertainty,” then Cordray never would have promulgated rules that would be cast into doubt by his own unconstitutional appointment. And if, today, Director Cordray were worried about this newly alleged “uncertainty,” then they can immediately alleviate it by suspending their newly promulgated regulations while the recess-appointment lawsuits remain pending, and allow the pre-CFPB regulatory structure to continue to foster responsible borrowing and lending by community banks and Main Street companies.

Carrie Severino — Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More