A False Choice on State Judicial Selection

Today’s New York Times has an ever-so-predictable house editorial decrying Iowa voters’ ejection of three state supreme court justices. (For a sounder perspective, see Thomas Sowell’s NRO essay today.) Lamenting the fundraising on both sides of the unsuccessful campaign to unseat Illinois chief justice Thomas Kilbride, the editorial concludes:

This year’s campaign is one more reminder of why the 39 states that hold judicial elections should scrap them in favor of merit screening and appointment of judges for a long fixed term.

But the choice of methods of state judicial selection is not limited to elections, on the one hand, and, on the other, a mislabeled “merit” system in which the governor is constrained to select among the few candidates who have been proposed by an unaccountable commission of supposed experts. One obvious alternative is the federal model, under which the governor would nominate judges and one house of the legislature would vote whether to confirm. Another alternative would vest sole appointive power in the governor.

My own judgment is that the merit-deception method proposed by the New York Times is probably the worst of all the obvious options—and that the variant of a “long fixed term” would make that option even worse. But in any event any serious consideration of options for state judicial selection ought to include the straight-appointment model and the nominate-and-confirm model.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More