Henry Waxman Endorses Judicial Supremacy

When Republicans take control of the House this week, they are expected to adopt a number of rules changes, including a requirement that every bill “be accompanied by a separate sheet of paper citing the constitutional authority to enact the proposed bill or joint resolution.”

Apparently, leading Democrats in the House disagree with the rule and would rather not even propose legislation that purports to be consistent with the Constitution. The Daily Caller reports that Rep. Barney Frank called it an “air kiss” to the Tea Party, and Rep. Henry Waxman reacted by saying, “When I went to law school they said the law’s what a judge says it is. Whether it is constitutional or not is going to be whether the Supreme Court says it is.” 

Mr. Waxman’s law professors weren’t the first to be wrong on that point, and I suspect he’d be less inclined to embrace judicial supremacy if he were reminded of Korematsu, Dred Scott, or Lochner — or, from his perspective at least, Citizens United. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not the Supreme Court or any other court, and the fact that judges are required to swear an oath to uphold the Constitution is just one piece of evidence that our society publicly recognizes that judges are just as capable of disregarding the Constitution as legislators and presidents. 

House Republican leaders deserve credit for publicly acknowledging their own fallibility and requiring congressmen to at least go through the exercise of identifying a source of constitutional authority for their important actions. As I wrote a couple of weeks ago when I touched on the importance and potentially salient benefits of this sort of rule:

I’m not naive enough to believe that such a move, on its own, would compel lawmakers to suddenly behave as though they care about limited constitutional government. But it would certainly be a big step in the right direction. If two decades of debating originalism conditioned the environment for Justice Kagan to sprinkle her Senate testimony with nuggets like “we are all originalists,” then perhaps small but important steps like these could condition the environment for the Constitution to regain its rightful place as the lodestar for officials in Congress.

Carrie Severino — Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More