It’s the Supreme Court, Stupid

This week’s Republican debate found the candidates in agreement on most topics, but only one candidate actually mentioned what I think will end up being one of the most important and enduring acts of the next president: appointing justices to the Supreme Court.

Tim Pawlenty twice noted his sterling record of judicial appointments in Minnesota during the debate, both when defending his pro-life stance and in the context of immigration. He hit the nail on the head when he noted that many of these issues will end up in the courts:

And, by the way, this issue of birthright citizenship again brings up the importance of appointing conservative justices. That result is because a U.S. Supreme Court determined that that right exists, notwithstanding language in the Constitution. I’m the only one up here — I believe I’m the only one up here — who’s appointed solidly, reliably conservative appointees to the — to the court.

Not all the nominees have had an opportunity to appoint judges, but they all should take those words to heart. The issues they — and the voters –care most about will not be determined in the White House, but at the Supreme Court. Abortion, immigration, health care, bailouts, government meddling in the economy, you name it — the Supreme Court will have the final word. Just as Wisconsin governor Scott Walker learned, passing and signing a law is only part of the process.  Because of a successful judicial election, the Wisconsin courts have upheld Walker’s labor reform law. With a different judge, it could have easily gone the other way. The Republican presidential hopefuls must realize that, without a commitment to a solid judiciary, their hard-fought accomplishments can be eliminated with the stroke of a judge’s pen.

Carrie Severino — Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More