“Judicial Engagement” or Government by Judiciary?

Regarding my Brother Whelan’s opinion, I concur in part and dissent in part.  Ed writes that “no serious advocate of judicial restraint contends that the courts should enforce laws that have been demonstrated to be unconstitutional.”  This is true . . . up to a point.  Perhaps I am too serious an advocate of judicial restraint, but I would say that courts should not presume to declare laws unconstitutional, no matter what has been “demonstrated” about them, if they concern constitutional questions that are not the proper business of courts.  In the schools they used to teach this, as I’m sure Ed remembers, as the “doctrine of political questions.”  The classic example concerns the “guarantee” to each state of a “Republican Form of Government” in Article IV.  This is a perfectly serious constitutional principle, consistently held by the Supreme Court to be absolutely none of its business.  Ditto for the requirement that the Senate of the United States “try all Impeachments.” The Court held in 1993 that the question whether an impeached officer got a trial worthy of the name from the Senate was a political question and thus “nonjusticiable,” or not a fitting subject for a judicial decision of any kind.

It is, to put it bluntly, not a principle of the Constitution that the judges are required, on every occasion that is brought to their attention, to “examine whether laws comply with the Constitution,” as Anthony Sanders puts it.  Sometime it is, and sometimes it isn’t–and getting that distinction right is a matter of high judicial duty, and should be part of any calculus of the very real difference between judicial activism and judicial restraint.

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Culture

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More
Immigration

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More