Justice Kennedy on the Politicization of the Court

On March 26 and 27, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor, two cases regarding same-sex marriage with potentially far-reaching consequences. All eyes are on potential swing vote Justice Kennedy, who authored the Court’s 2003 decision striking down a Texas anti-sodomy statute. This all makes recent comments by Justice Kennedy especially interesting. From the Associated Press:

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy said Wednesday that congressional lawmakers need to maintain the nation’s balance of power by being able to compromise, expressing concerns that the high court is increasingly the venue for deciding politically charged issues such as gay marriage, health care and immigration.

Kennedy, a former Sacramento law school professor, was asked by reporters whether he thought the court was deciding too many issues that can be decided by Congress.

“I think it’s a serious problem. A democracy should not be dependent for its major decisions on what nine unelected people from a narrow legal background have to say,” Kennedy said. “And I think it’s of tremendous importance for our political system to show the rest of the world—and we have to show ourselves first—that democracy works because we can reach agreement on a principle basis.”

The exact import of Justice Kennedy’s comments isn’t clear — we should know a whole lot more after this month’s oral arguments — but they could be a promising sign for those who support federalism and the text and original meaning of the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps Justice Kennedy realizes that the Court could avoid, as I put it last week, “detonating a dirty bomb in a culture war that already seems to be going pretty well for one side,” by letting Congress define marriage for the purposes of federal law only and freeing each state to define marriage as they choose.

Carrie Severino — Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More