Law & Obligation: Final Comment

In the conclusion to his latest post, Matthew Franck writes that the more he looks at Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion, the more defensible he finds it. Except that he has abandoned the defense of Roberts’s attempt to justify his conclusion by using a “functional” analysis of the provision that most of us always called the “individual mandate.” Since Franck has conceded that this analysis, as applied here, is radically defective, I am happy to declare victory and move on.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More