Leahy Stacks Deck for Hearing (and Still Loses)

NRO contributor Robert Alt (a colleague of mine at Heritage) did us proud on Wednesday when testifying at the show trial — er, I mean, hearing — called by Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.).

How stacked was this hearing? Consider its title: “Barriers to Justice and Accountability: How the Supreme Court’s Recent Rulings Will Affect Corporate Behavior.” As ranking Republican member Charles Grassley (Iowa) noted in his opening statement, the very title suggested a predetermined conclusion. This was fated to be just another lame attempt to bash conservatives on the Court as “pro-business.”

Along with Andrew J. Pincus, an attorney at Mayer Brown, Robert appeared for the minority. His opening statement obviously annoyed Leahy, who interrupted him to criticize his supposed sarcastic tone.

Now, those who know Robert or who have read him in NRO know that he can certainly be sarcastic at times. But there was no trace of sarcasm in his opening statement. Robert was simply disagreeing with the premise set out by Leahy and pointing out that the chairman’s assertions about the Court were not supported by the facts. Apparently, proving that Patrick Leahy is wrong (a not infrequent occurrence) is being sarcastic.

Robert cited case after case in which the Supreme Court ruled against corporations and businesses. Certainly he won no brownie points in saying that Leahy was pushing a “pro-corporatist fiction” about the Roberts Court. In addition to cherry-picking cases, Robert noted, critics of the court “have also assiduously avoided revealing the fact that liberal members of the Court have been the authors of some of the very cases of which they complain, and of some of the more pro-business cases that they conveniently omit.”

Pincus raised the ire of both Leahy and Sen. Al Franken (D., Minn.) by pointing out that in the just-concluded term, the Supreme Court ruled against corporations in nine cases and ruled in favor of corporations in nine cases. Irked to hear that the term yielded a tie game between businesses and plaintiffs, Leahy got himself in more trouble by asking, “Well, what about prior terms of the court?” Corporations and businesses did even worse in prior terms, Pincus answered.

Leahy called three witnesses to make his case. Two were law school professors: Melissa Hart from the University of Colorado and James D. Cox from Duke University. This pair demonstrated why Walter Olson has called law schools “schools for misrule.”

When discussion turned to the Supreme Court’s recent decision throwing out a class-action lawsuit against Walmart, Professor Hart gave one of the silliest examples of a supposedly discriminatory policy that I have ever heard. Walmart discriminates against women, she asserted, because it requires that managers be willing to relocate. I was sitting between two women in the audience of the hearing room and when Hart said that, they both turned to me with looks of total confusion.

Professor Cox’s testimony was emotional and over-the-top. It was hard to believe that he has written a security law textbook used in law schools all over the country. His basic argument was reducible to the claim that all corporations are evil and just out to despoil and loot the public.

This hearing showed how the minority can hijack a hearing called by the majority if they choose good witnesses who are willing to confront the majority members and not back down. On Wednesday, Alt and Pincus totally destroyed the fiction which the majority was trying to project to the public. Hopefully, we will see more of that kind of competent hearing management in the future.

— Hans von Spakovsky is a senior fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.

Hans A. von Spakovsky — Heritage Foundation – As a Senior Legal Fellow and Manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, Hans von Spakovsky concentrates on voting, ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More