A (Limited but Ungrudging) Apology to Akhil Amar

Yesterday I posted a comment here about Ezra Klein’s latest contribution to the advance critique that if the ObamaCare case comes down against the law’s constitutionality in whole or in part, it will be because of pure “partisanship” by the Republican-affiliated justices on the Supreme Court.  I particularly held up for ridicule a fairly hyperbolic lament by Yale’s Akhil Reed Amar that a closely-divided adverse ruling would convince him that his life has been a fraud, and that after all law doesn’t matter, but only “politics, money, party, and party loyalty.”

Professor Amar contacted me to object particularly to one sentence where I remarked that “I have never known him to complain about those to his left who have been” among the “worst offenders” in subordinating the law to political ends.  He supplied me with ample evidence of sharp criticisms he has from time to time published of fashionable positions taken in the mainstream of the liberal legal academy.  Professor Amar has published a lot, and I have not read it all, so that particular comment was ill-informed.  I retract it, and apologize for it.

I continue to think it was an irresponsible contribution to the public discussion of the pending health-care decision for Professor Amar to chalk up the expected negative votes of some yet-unknown number of the justices on the constitutionality of the law to partisanship in some narrow sense.  (And how did “money” come into the picture, for goodness’ sake?)  I reiterate what I said yesterday, that Professor Amar has written interesting work.  But that makes it all the more disappointing to see him feed red meat to the likes of Ezra Klein.

I hope, however the case comes down next week, supporters and critics of the ruling will try to confine themselves to discussion of the credence they can give to the arguments in the opinions, rather than muttering darkly about motives among the justices that they can, in truth, know nothing about.

I also hope that Professor Amar will take my persistence on this point as not detracting from the unstinting apology above for an unjust characterization!


Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More