McGinnis/Rappaport’s Originalism and the Good Constitution—Part 1

I’ve now completed Originalism and the Good Constitution, an important new book co-authored by leading originalist scholars John O. McGinnis and Michael B. Rappaport. In their book, McGinnis and Rappaport present a “normative defense of constitutional originalism”—i.e., an argument that “originalism advances the welfare of the present-day citizens of the United States because it promotes constitutional interpretations that are likely to have better consequences today than those of nonoriginalist theories.”

Originalism and the Good Constitution is an impressive work, rich with interesting and intelligent arguments. In developing their normative argument for originalism, McGinnis and Rappaport stake out and defend various positions on contested points of originalist methodology. Their book will surely play a prominent role in the ongoing debate over originalism.

I won’t try to summarize the entire book here. But I would like to sketch, in this post and the next, two sets of objections and reservations that I have. Here’s my first:

I’m not persuaded that McGinnis and Rappaport offer the best or the most effective normative defense of originalism. They identify but reject one “nonconsequentialist argument for originalism”—namely, that “it follows from the concept of law.” As they sum up the argument, “If we are to be faithful to law, we must follow the law’s original meaning.” They observe that “it seems doubtful that originalism would have much appeal if the Constitution reflected the policies of a brutal dictator.” But that strikes me as an argument against a brutal constitution (and against an absolutist duty to be faithful to law, no matter how evil), not an argument against originalism.

To state my point more affirmatively: I find much more appealing the normative argument for originalism that law professor Lawrence B. Solum makes in his long law-review article “Semantic Originalism” (pp. 149-160). That argument, at its essence, is that in a “reasonably just society” like ours, it’s wrong to lie about the meaning of the Constitution. (That normative argument in turn builds on Solum’s argument that the semantic content of any clause of the Constitution is the clause’s original public meaning.) Even in the collapsing state of our culture, the proposition that it’s generally wrong to lie seems to me to retain broad appeal.

By contrast, as McGinnis and Rappaport acknowledge, their normative argument is based on “welfare consequentialism” (“a modern version of utilitarianism”), which is a “controversial foundation for moral and political theory.” Further, while I think that McGinnis and Rappaport responsibly carry out their assessment of the societal consequences of originalism, any such assessment is so malleable and so contestable that other welfare consequentialists could easily arrive at different conclusions. In particular, given the high level of confidence that living constitutionalists have in their own judgments of what policies are best for society (and of what matters therefore ought to be removed from the democratic processes), I doubt that they are likely to be persuaded by a consequentialist argument for originalism.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Science & Tech

Set NASA Free

The Trump administration has proposed shifting the International Space Station from a NASA-exclusive research facility to a semi-public, semi-private one. Its plan would nix all government funding for the ISS by 2025 and award at least $150 million per year to NASA to help with the transition. This would be a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More