Misguided Amicus Brief Defending Prop 8 Non-Recusals—Part 3

In addition to the direct case for then-district judge Vaughn Walker’s recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455, the bulk of my amicus brief in the Prop 8 case is dedicated to documenting Walker’s egregious course of misconduct—a course of misconduct that itself constitutes prima facie evidence that Walker was so biased that he should have recused himself (and that also counsels extreme skepticism about any assertion or finding that Walker made). To this, the Kaye/Gillers amicus brief (link to be added when available) responds only with the proposition that “judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion” (p. 29 n. 11 (emphasis added)). I take no issue with that proposition, but the “almost never” phrase signals that there are exceptional circumstances where judicial rulings alone would constitute a valid basis for impugning a judge’s impartiality. If such circumstances ever exist, Walker’s extraordinary rampage presents them. (And, of course, those rulings need not be considered “alone” but may be combined with the case for Walker’s recusal under section 355.)

The Kaye/Gillers amicus brief also argues that the recusal issues are not properly presented to the Court. But, irrespective whether the issues are within the scope of the questions presented, the Court’s supervisory power over the lower courts is surely broad enough to enable it to vacate the ruling of an improperly constituted panel and of a grossly biased judge. The Court has made clear that its rule that it will consider only the questions presented (or questions fairly included in the questions presented) “is prudential; it does not limit [the Court’s] power to decide important questions not raised by the parties.” Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. US Philips Corp., 510 U.S. 27, 32 (1993) (internal citations omitted).  While an exception to the rule should be exercised “only in the most exceptional cases,” id. at 33, the misconduct by Walker and the non-recusals by Walker and by Judge Reinhardt satisfy that standard. Further, one of the exceptions the Court has made in the past also fits here: “We have also decided a case on nonconstitutional grounds even though the petition for certiorari presented only a constitutional question.”  Id. (citing cases).

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More