Missouri Bar President Disregards the Facts

John Johnston, president of the Missouri Bar, has responded to the recent Wall Street Journal editorial in which the Journal made the indisputable observation that the Missouri Plan is basically a tool for trial lawyers to hand-pick judges. (See here for my previous post on the topic.) In his response, he made several factual assertions that I am fairly certain any lawyer would be unwilling to make on behalf of a client in front of a judge. 

First, he claims that “merit selection works to remove politics from the selection of judges.” False! As I wrote in August, Prof. Brian Fitzpatrick’s empirical study of all appellate nominees in Tennessee and Missouri since 1995 (the most comprehensive on this issue) makes this claim of non-partisanship specious. 

In Tennessee, his data showed that 67 percent of appellate nominees had voted in Democratic primaries, compared to only 33 percent in Republican primaries, even though the state’s voters were split evenly between the two parties. In Missouri, the data were even more stark: For the nominees for whom campaign donation data was available, 87 percent donated primarily to Democrats, while only 13 percent gave primarily to Republicans. The amount of money contributed by judicial nominees was skewed 93 percent to Democrats and only 7 percent to Republicans.  

Second, he claims that “the citizens of Missouri are pleased with the Missouri Plan.” False! In 2009, the Missouri House of Representatives approved a constitutional amendment that would have made Missouri’s judicial selection system more like the federal method enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The measure failed in the state senate only after trial lawyers organized a filibuster, a fact that even the Soros-funded American Judicature Society acknowledges. 

Beyond legislative efforts to abolish the Missouri Plan — which are intensifying in Missouri and across the nation — we can also measure public approval/disapproval by consulting public-opinion surveys. According to two separate surveys conducted by The Polling Company on behalf of The Federalist Society, the vast majority of Missourians would prefer a different method of selection. Those results are consistent with a national survey conducted by Harris Interactive on behalf of the American Bar Association, finding that less than 20 percent of citizens prefer a Missouri Plan method of selecting judges. 

Johnston ends his letter with a platitudinous request that the Journal stop criticizing the Missouri Plan and instead lobby “to keep judges impartial, separate from political fund raising and the biases of party politics.” Apparently no one ever taught him the old adage about throwing stones from glass houses.

Carrie Severino — Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More