NYT Goes Overboard on NSA Decision

The New York Times is thrilled with Judge Taylor’s decision striking down the NSA surveilance program. In their rush to praise the decision, however, it seems the Times’ editorial writers went a bit overboard, calling it a “careful, thoroughly grounded opinion” and claiming it “eviscerated” the primary arguments made by the Bush Administration. Yet as Eugene Volokh notes, the opinion did nothing of the kind, and has been criticized by those who support the outcome. The editorial is prima facie evidence of what many of us have claimed for some time: The Times’ editorialists care far more about policy outcomes than they do about legal reasoning .

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More