Obamacare and Religious Liberty: Mandating Carcinogens as ‘Women’s Preventive Health’

On January 28, 2014, a unique HHS mandate amicus brief was filed in the U.S. Supreme Court by three cancer-research institutes, 286 members of Legatus, and CatholicVote by Bioethics Defense Fund attorneys Nikolas T. Nikas and Dorinda Bordlee, and Professor Patrick T. Gillen of Ave Maria Law School.

The HHS abortifacient mandate violates the free-exercise rights of individuals and business owners like the amici Legatus members, business owners and executives who, like the owners of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods, are denied their rights of religious liberty. The amicus brief demonstrates how this coercive government action fails to meet the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act requirement that it be in “furtherance” of the government’s purported compelling interest — which it asserts here is promoting women’s “preventive” health care.

The brief shows that the government’s claim that religious-liberty rights must be violated in the interest of women’s “preventive” health care is an empty and biased assertion. A robust body of widely accepted research that the government selectively ignored is surveyed in the amicus brief, showing that the mandated contraceptive drugs and devices significantly increase risks of serious disease, including HIV, stroke, and heart attack. Notably, as cited by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in another HHS challenge, the brief brings the Court’s attention to the 2007 report of the World Health Organization that classifies combined oral contraceptives as “Group 1: Carcinogenic to Humans” — doubling and tripling risks of deadly breast, cervical, and liver cancers.

The research information presented to the Court was compiled in consultation with physicians and researchers of amici Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, the Abortion/Breast Cancer Coalition and the Polycarp Research Institute.

The brief was also filed on behalf of 286 members of Legatus and members of CatholicVote, who object to the mandated drugs based on the teaching reflected in Evangelium Vitae, an encyclical by Blessed Pope John Paul II: “Abortion [is a] crime[] which no human law can claim to legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws; instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection.”

Amici Legatus and CatholicVote members also object to the HHS mandate because sterilization, contraception and abortifacient drugs must be provided for free — “without cost-sharing” — to enrollees and their female dependents who have “reproductive capacity.” This means that the coercive mandate forces parents to provide free access to their minor daughters who have reached the stage of menstruation, thus undermining the Catholic moral duty of a parent to guide their children concerning the right ordering of human sexuality. In support, the brief shows how the government ignored studies establishing that free access to emergency contraceptives increases risky and uncommitted sexual behavior, thus increasing unintended pregnancy, abortion, and sexually transmitted diseases.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case brought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods and their owners on March 25, 2014. To read the brief or learn more go here.

— Dorinda C. Bordlee is a co-founder, along with Nikolas T. Nikas, of the Bioethics Defense Fund, a public-interest legal and educational organization whose mission is to put law in the service of life.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More