Paging Congressman King

My friend Adam MacLeod, a visiting fellow at Princeton University’s James Madison Program this year and a law professor at Faulkner University, writes in response to Rep. Steve King’s Corner post this morning:

I am grateful for Congressman Steve King’s sensible voice, and equally grateful that National Review gives him a venue to exercise it. So, I hope that I do not appear ungrateful by correcting a misstatement in the title of his essay on NRO, “Marriage is Illegal… Without a License.” He repeats the misstatement in the text itself: “A license is a permit to do that which is otherwise illegal.”

That is true of driver’s licenses, professional licenses, and hunting licenses. But it is not true of marriage licenses. The licensing scheme for marriage is not paired with any prohibitions against unlicensed marriage. In fact, civil marriage has long co-existed with common-law marriage, ceremonial and religious marriage, and cohabitation. Unlike the licensing scheme for medical doctors (for example) the licensing scheme for civil marriage encourages legal recognition of real marriages—monogamous man-woman pairings—that exist outside the scheme.

This is important because proponents of removing sexual complementarity from our marriage laws today argue that the redefinition is necessary to eradicate the same-sex “marriage ban.” There is no ban. Same-sex couples who hold themselves out as married face no criminal or civil penalties. No administrative agency prohibits the Episcopal Church from solemnizing same-sex weddings. (That fact has, incidentally, gone largely unnoticed in the controversy over the HHS mandate requiring Catholic and evangelical institutions to subsidize employees’ use of contraceptives and abortifacient drugs.) What proponents of redefinition want is not to eradicate any ban but rather to change the definition of marriage for everyone.

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More