Polygamy, a Modest Next Step

The New York Times reports today that George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley is expected to file a federal lawsuit tomorrow, on behalf of Kody Brown, an open practitioner of polygamy in Utah, arguing that the state’s law against having multiple spouses is unconstitutional.  This argument comes to us courtesy of Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 Supreme Court ruling establishing a constitutional “right” to homosexual sodomy.  Lawrence, of course, was the poisonous tree that bore predictable fruit mere months later when it was cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court as support for its same-sex marriage ruling, notwithstanding the advance protestations in the Lawrence opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Mr. Brown has a Utah marriage license with only one of his four wives, and so he claims that any legal jeopardy in which he finds himself under Utah law would constitute an intrusion on his “private” choice of “intimate conduct.”  I suppose there will be the routine citations of the Casey-Lawrence “sweet mystery of life” reasoning too.

Of course the complete dismantling of all civil regulation of marital relations and sexual conduct is exactly where we have been heading ever since Justice Kennedy’s deeply foolish Lawrence opinion.  The Times manages to find one law professor willing to stick her fingers in her ears and say “la la la I can’t hear you” to the proposition that the Lawrence reasoning has propelled us in this direction.  And Professor Turley, dutifully speaking for his client, wants us to believe that his claim is a moderate and limited one.  But literally no one else has reason to believe such tripe.  Here we go.  Here we have always known we would go.

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More