Law & the Courts

Re: Shirley, You Can’t Be Serious

On a spot check, it’s not surprising to discover that, contrary to Wisconsin chief justice Shirley Abrahamson’s brazen lawsuit, the public debate over the referendum to alter the method for determining the chief justice of the Wisconsin supreme court reflected a broad understanding that the proposed change, if adopted, would apply right away. Take, for example, this report from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (emphasis added):

Groups called on voters Monday to reject a proposed amendment to the Wisconsin constitution that would allow state Supreme Court justices to select their chief justice, rather than have the position go to the most senior member of the court. 

If approved April 7, the change is expected to dislodge Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson from the court’s top job. Abrahamson would remain on the high court but no longer have administrative control of it.…

The groups represented at the news conference said the Republican-backed effort was a partisan attack on Abrahamson

“It’s quite clear Wisconsin is reaching a meltdown stage,” said Bert Brandenburg, executive director of Justice at Stake, who called the proposal “pure political hardball.”

Abrahamson is 81 years old, and her current term as a justice does not expire until 2019, the year in which she turns 86. No one would call it “political hardball” to defer her displacement until then.

See also this Madison television news editorial that, in the course of opposing the referendum, complains that it is motivated by a “desire by some to remove current Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson from serving as chief justice.”

(If anyone can show me any evidence of the reading that Abrahamson is now advancing, I’d be interested.)

Most Popular

Immigration

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Religion

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More