Re: Tokin’ Federalism

I think Matthew’s legal and constitutional concerns about the Obama Administration’s new policy concerning medical marijuana to be misplaced. 

First, it is not at all uncommon for the legality of conduct under federal law to be dependent upon state law.  To take the most obvious example, under 27 U.S.C. 122, it is against federal law to transport alcoholic beverages into a state in violation of state law.  Therefore, under federal law, it is legal to something in one place but not another because of differences in state law. The purpose of such laws is to allow states to adopt laws that reflect local preferences while simultaneously protecting states from the spillover effects of their neighbors’ choices.  So, in the case of alcohol, the post-prohibition policy was to say: State A can legalize alcohol if they like, but the federal government will not allow State A to become a source of illegal alcohol for State B, in which alcohol is still prohibited.  This sort of law makes perfect sense within our federal system.  Indeed, such federal laws are preferable to federal efforts to create uniformity on divisive questions of social policy.

Second, it is also not anomolous or particularly unusual for the federal government to announce a policy of declining to prosecute to the full extent possible under given laws or statutes.  The federal government lacks the resources to pursue all acts prohibited by federal law, so choices must be made.  In some cases, it makes sense to base those chocies on broader policy judgments than ad hoc, case-by-case determinations.  This is particularly common in the regulatory context.  A given regulatory statute may, on its face, apply to thousands of instances of a given conduct.  But the relevant enforcement agency, seeking to focus its efforts where they wil do the most good, may announce a policy of focusing its efforts on those instances where there are real harms.  So, for instance, in the environmental context, the EPA may announce it will prioritize regulatory violations that result in measurable amounts of environmental contamination, and generally ignore paperwork violations.  This doesn’t make such conduct legal, as the agency in question inevitably reserves the right to prosecute any violation — as the Justice Department has here — but it does provide greater predictability, which is an important rule of law concern.

For more of my thoughts on the Obama Administration’s announcement, see here and here.

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More