In Response to Voucher Parents, DOJ Wisely Tucks Tail in Louisiana School-Choice Case

This Justice Department has been no friend to school-choice programs across the country, and the silly lawsuit in Louisiana is no exception. On August 22 of this year, DOJ filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana pursuant to a 40-year-old open desegregation order, arguing in effect that allowing minority students to escape failing schools impeded government efforts to integrate students into failing schools.

In preparation for litigation, voucher students and parents and the Louisiana Black Alliance for Education Options filed motions to intervene in the lawsuit. They argued, for example, that “it is perverse to attempt to thwart [intervening] children’s educational opportunities by invoking a desegregation decree intended to vindicate their educational opportunities.”

Apparently DOJ didn’t want real, live student beneficiaries of voucher programs to make it into court. In an order yesterday denying intervention, Judge Ivan L. R. Lemelle noted that DOJ had recently opposed intervention by contending that it was not, in fact, trying to stop the Louisiana school-choice program. Rather, DOJ had “abandon[ed] its previous request that the Court ‘permanently enjoin the State from issuing any further voucher awards’” and that instead, all DOJ is asking for in the case is that the court “create a process to ensure that the State provides necessary information.”

This appears to be, in part, a face-saving operation by DOJ. In ordinary litigation, parties do not implicitly abandon requests for relief buried on page four of a response to a motion to intervene.

But whether because of the public outcry against DOJ excesses, fear of arguing untenable positions in open court against angry parents and students, or an attempt to pull a fast one, it appears that DOJ has dropped this fight against the Louisiana program.

As Judge Lemelle noted, however, “the position of the United States may again change. . . . Should the United States renew its request to enjoin the voucher program, Proposed Intervenors are free, at that time, to file a new motion to intervene.” If for example, the political winds again change, and DOJ feels free to revive these portions of the lawsuit, ever-vigilant voucher students and parents should once again join the court battle. For today, however, these parents and their children have won.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More