The “Roberts Court” and “Judicial Activism”

In August, Justice Ginsburg made news with her criticism of the Supreme Court:

If it’s measured in terms of readiness to overturn legislation, this is one of the most activist courts in history…. This court has overturned more legislation, I think, than any other.

This article by Adam Liptak in Sunday’s New York Times refutes Justice Ginsburg’s contention. As Liptak sums up the data, “If judicial activism is defined as the tendency to strike down laws, the court led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. is less activist than any court in the last 60 years.”

As I discussed in my original post on Ginsburg’s claim, I don’t think that her neutered definition of judicial activism is sound, nor do I think that Ginsburg can be taken seriously as a proponent of judicial restraint. That said, it’s good to have the record straightened out on how often the so-called “Roberts Court” strikes down legislation.

I say so-called because I think that the convention of naming the Court after the reigning Chief Justice often obscures more than it enlightens. Given the decisive role that Justice Kennedy plays in so many 5-4 ideological divides (with the Obamacare case as a major exception), it would be far more accurate to think of the Court as the Kennedy Court.

Indeed, according to Liptak’s data, Justice Kennedy has voted with the majority in 94% of the cases in which the “Roberts Court” has struck down a law. As Liptak suggests, that fact makes rather bizarre Kennedy’s recent (award-winning) lament that “Any society that relies on nine unelected judges to resolve the most serious issues of the day is not a functioning democracy.”

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his editor, I’m going to have to keep this short. I’ve spent most of every day this week in a studio recording the audiobook version of my dead-tree/pixel ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More