Schumer and Stare Decisis

Senator Schumer’s comparison of the role of stare decisis on the Supreme Court with that on the Third Circuit is inapt. While it seems that an appellate court should treat its own precedent the way that the Supreme Court treats its Supreme Court precedent – as Schumer suggested and Alito accepted – I think that the parallel breaks down. An intermediate appellate court, unlike the Supreme Court, must alter its own precedent to conform with relevant Supreme Court precedent, even when not directly controlling (that is, intervening Supreme Court precedent may counsel altering appellate court precedent even where it does not directly overrule such precedent). Moreover, intermediate appellate courts should be more open to persuasive authority from other courts than the Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court has no “sister” courts to which it can look. As for Alito, I do not think that Senator Schumer accurately characterizes Judge Alito’s record, and that his opinions have tended to conform more closely with applicable precedent than have those of many of his colleagues.

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More