But She Doesn’t Know the Territory!

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that retired justice Sandra Day O’Connor is going to drop in on the little people of Iowa next month to instruct them that it’s just bad bad bad to want to hold judges accountable at the polls for their tyrannical usurpations of political power:

Conservative activists are trying to oust three judges on the state Supreme Court whose unanimous ruling last year legalized same-sex unions. . . .

The effort in Iowa worries not only gay rights advocates but some legal experts who say it is wrong to punish judges for an unpopular decision. For critics of judicial elections, Iowa is offering a compelling example of the peril of subjecting judges to voters’ whims.

Backers of the campaign say they are simply exercising their democratic right to rein in a judiciary that has overstepped its authority on same-sex marriage and other issues. . . .

The controversy has drawn the attention of the Iowa Bar Association and legal experts around the country, including former U.S. Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who is slated to address the matter at an event here next month. O’Connor for years has spoken out against the judicial elections, arguing that they create “politicians in robes.”

The Post’s Sandhya Somashekhar might honestly be making an effort to be evenhanded in the second and third paragraphs excerpted above.  But “overstepped its authority” would be an apt description of a state supreme court that had ruled, say, that a confession can be thrown out because police did not get a Miranda warning’s recitation letter-perfect.  When judges create a right to same-sex marriage out of whole cloth, that’s more than “overstepping.”  That’s a direct assault on the constitutional order, and the effort to defeat the offending Iowa jurists in this year’s retention elections is understood by its advocates to be an attempt to restore something severely damaged by the judges.

Somashekhar talked to “legal experts” concerned that the judges are threatened with being “punished” for “an unpopular decision.”  Removal from office for a betrayal of trust could, I suppose, be described as “punishment.”  But the Iowa record–no justice of its supreme court has ever been removed before in a retention election–suggests that mere “unpopularity” has never moved the people of the Hawkeye State to precipitous behavior.  Couldn’t Somashekhar find any “legal experts” to express the other side of things here?  (Next time try Ed Whelan, whose e-mail address is published on this site!)  As for the “peril of subjecting judges to voters’ whims,” how about the peril of subjecting voters to judges’ whims?

And that brings us to Sandra Day O’Connor, one of the most effective and successful “politicians in robes” ever to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States.  She is dedicating her declining years to the cause of “judicial independence,” which for her means: no judicial elections in the states; no talk of reform in the federal judiciary; no probing questions during Supreme Court nomination hearings; no wild talk of impeaching federal judges no matter how obvious their usurpations; and, in fine, no criticism of the judiciary that actually calls the judges what they are, usurping tyrants.  Justice O’Connor, you see, is dead set against us mere voters “politicizing the judiciary.”  Don’t we understand that that’s the judges’ job?

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More