A Swing and a Miss in the Marriage Debate

At Slate, NYU law prof Kenji Yoshino winds up for a big swing against the “What Is Marriage?” article recently published by Girgis, George, and Anderson (henceforth GG&A)–he is particularly bothered by the sports metaphors the authors use–but he utterly fails to connect.  Yoshino doesn’t meet the logic of GG&A’s arguments, and really attempts no refutation at all.  Instead, after misreading what GG&A have to say about the marriages of childless or infertile couples, Yoshino complains that–on the basis of his misreading–GG&A have “demeaned” couples who have no children, or intend to have none, and even those who have adopted children.  Of course, even if he were reading GG&A correctly, Yoshino would still not be meeting the substance of their argument, only complaining about its implications.  But he hasn’t even any grounds for his whining.

Bottom line: Yoshino provides nothing–nothing at all–by way of an argument for including gay couples in the institution of marriage.  For he provides no alternative answer to the question Girgis, George, and Anderson propound: What Is Marriage?  Is this the best pro-gay-marriage folks can do?

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More