Those Law Professors Say the Darnedest Things

In yet another in an endless series of unintentionally comic statements by law professors, I’ll highlight this passage from the LA Times account of Justice Scalia’s speech yesterday at an event organized by the Tea Party Caucus of the House of Representatives (and open to all members of Congress):

University of Texas law professor Lucas A. Powe, a historian of the Warren Court, said Scalia’s appearance makes the court look partisan. “He is taking political partisanship to levels not seen in over half a century,” Powe said.

Powe, as a historian of the Warren Court and a former law clerk to Justice William O. Douglas, ought to know something about “political partisanship.” Indeed, according to his own summary of one of his books, Powe “find[s] the Warren Court a functioning partner in Kennedy-Johnson liberalism.” Yet Powe somehow sees fit to compare with the Warren Court’s history of political decisionmaking Scalia’s speaking on a legal topic to a bipartisan group of members of Congress. Ludicrous.

As just one example of political partisanship (beyond judicial decisionmaking) by members of the Warren Court, I’ll note that (according to Seth Stern’s and Stephen Wermiel’s new biography of Justice Brennan (p. 306)) Justice Abe Fortas had a “role writing [President] Johnson’s 1966 State of the Union address—several months after joining the Court.” As that was less than “half a century” ago, Powe would evidently have us believe that Scalia’s speaking on separation of powers at an event organized by the Tea Party Caucus of the House of Representatives—an action that, for reasons that I’ve explained, strikes me (and others, such as liberal legal ethicist Stephen Gillers) as nonpartisan and unobjectionable—was somehow more partisan than Fortas’s role in drafting Johnson’s State of the Union address. Absurd.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his editor, I’m going to have to keep this short. I’ve spent most of every day this week in a studio recording the audiobook version of my dead-tree/pixel ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More