In (Very Limited) Defense of Kermit Gosnell

Kudos to Democratic political commentator (and former Clinton administration official) Kirsten Powers for her USA Today column condemning the “disgrace” of the “deafening silence” of the media on the horrific “headline-worthy testimony” in the murder trial of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell. As Powers points out:

[W]hether Gosnell was killing the infants one second after they left the womb instead of partially inside or completely inside the womb — as in a routine late-term abortion — is merely a matter of geography. That one is murder and the other is a legal procedure is morally irreconcilable.

Gosnell is consistent in regarding in utero babies and ex utero newborns as of equal moral worth—and consistently wrong in believing that, with the nicety of the consent of the baby’s mother, he may kill them. It is those people who support our broader abortion culture, but who draw an arbitrary line at birth, who are morally schizophrenic. (Yes, I realize that perhaps we should be a tad thankful for their schizophrenia, for many or most of them, if forced to be consistent, might well opt for Gosnell’s consistency. After all, isn’t opposition to infanticide ultimately rooted in religious convictions about the inherent dignity of every human life?)

There’s much more on the Corner on this very revealing episode, including Shannen Coffin’s “Kermit Gosnell Is Not an Outlier” and Jonah Goldberg’s opening excerpt from the grand-jury report, the first paragraph of which I reproduce here:

This case is about a doctor who killed babies and endangered women. What we mean is that he regularly and illegally delivered live, viable, babies in the third trimester of pregnancy – and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors. The medical practice by which he carried out this business was a filthy fraud in which he overdosed his patients with dangerous drugs, spread venereal disease among them with infected instruments, perforated their wombs and bowels – and, on at least two occasions, caused their deaths. Over the years, many people came to know that something was going on here. But no one put a stop to it.

Update: Read, if you dare to, this powerful Atlantic piece by Conor Friedersdorf, “Why Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s Trial Should Be a Front-Page Story.”

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More