For Affirmative Action in Politics

Georgia Republicans are picking a Senate candidate out of a five-person field tomorrow. The top three candidates, says RCP (as others also say) are “businessman David Perdue, Congressman Jack Kingston, and former Secretary of State Karen Handel.”

I don’t have a strong sense of the strengths and weaknesses of these candidates. I do think, however, that conservatives should treat Handel’s being a woman as a reason to give her a mild preference. If a male candidate has views that are much more sound, is more competent, or has some other significant advantage, I would not vote for the female candidate on the basis of sex alone. When those considerations leave the candidates in a position of rough equality, though, I would favor the woman. I would do so not on any ground of equity: It’s not because I think it’s about time we had more women in office. I would do it because I think that having more conservative women in office would advance conservative causes. (If you consider a political campaign to be a job interview in which conservatives are selecting for the ability to advance conservative causes, then what I’m saying is that being female is a bona fide job qualification in the parlance of civil-rights law.)

Having more female pro-life officeholders would be especially helpful in dispelling the impression that opposition to abortion is a matter of men seeking to control women. It would be helpful, I think, in all kinds of ways. I suspect, for example, that the massive gender gap in attitudes on abortion among female officeholders has helped to contribute to the widespread but false impression that there is such a gender gap among voters in general. (In truth, pro-life women are the most underrepresented group in American politics.) That impression, in turn, makes Republican politicians unduly cautious about the issue, probably drives down support for the pro-life position, and complicates efforts to get the position across in the media.

Some conservatives think it would be wrong to practice this sort of affirmative action, and I am sure that it could have various negative consequences if taken too far. In principle, though, I don’t see anything wrong with it. I’d sure like the Senate to have more than two conservative women.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More