The Corner

After the Boys of Summer Are Gone

During the Republican primary debates in the summer of 2011, I pilloried the candidates for their united declaration that they would reject a deficit-reduction deal that had $10 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases. In fact, I suggested that the appropriate response to such a suggestion might include gently stoning a few of them. The reaction from the right was nearly uniformly hostile: I was a “fool” even to consider such a deal, wrote one commentator. David French took to the Corner to chastise me for being insufficiently “savvy.” Americans for Tax Reform declared that “any lawmaker willing to consider a ‘grand bargain’ is poised to become another fool of history.” The main criticism of my position was that the Democrats were likely to renege on the spending cuts, a valid objection that could be overcome simply by structuring the deal in such as way as to require the spending reductions to precede the tax increases — hardly an exotic idea. But, no: Even to consider such a deal was apostasy.

Ah, the heady days of summer 2011! Here in the cold closing days of 2012, that 10-to-1 deal is looking pretty good, isn’t it? In fact, it is looking a lot better than anything House Republicans are likely to negotiate in the lead-up to the so-called fiscal cliff.

The sort of ideological rigidity on display in Iowa might have come off as principled consistency if the Republicans had shown some measure of fiscal restraint the last time they were running the show, but they failed to do so, and in doing so forfeited their traditional rhetorical edge on the subject of deficits and fiscal responsibility. As it stands, Republicans’ anti-tax rhetoric sounds like very little more than partisan bell-ringing to a great many voters, and the party leaders have made it regrettably easy for the media to portray the GOP as a hostage to Grover Norquist. The value of this as a political strategy can be seen not only in this year’s election results but also in the size of the deficit and the ever-increasing scale of federal spending. It does not work. This is not a call to “moderation,” which of course is defined in our political discourse as “doing whatever the New York Times editorial board would like.” Rather, it is a call for Republican leaders to stop being such a bunch of chumps. The partisans of the American welfare state did not build it after winning a national mandate in some glorious electoral triumph; they built it piece by piece, steadily, patiently, and remorselessly, over many decades. It probably will have to be unbuilt in much the same way. But Republicans, holding out for the big victory that never comes, fail to achieve all of the little victories along the way that eventually add up to something. 

And as a result, the next deal is not going to be 10:1 in favor of spending cuts, but probably more like 4:1 in favor of taxes. And the Republicans will receive scant credit for any willingness to compromise, because they will be doing so from a position of weakness rather than one of strength. 

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More