The Corner

Against the RNC’s Gay-Marriage Resolution


Tomorrow, members of the Republican National Committee will consider a resolution opposing same-sex marriage. As former RNC operatives, we feel strongly that passage of this resolution would risk further marginalization of the Republican party and would be a departure from the RNC’s primary role as a political operation as opposed to a policy shop or an advocacy group.

Democrats and the media would be quick to use the passage of such a resolution to claim uniformity of Republican views on same-sex marriage where none exists; indeed, a great many Republicans who donate to the RNC and man its volunteer operations support same-sex marriage. Meanwhile, Republican candidates and officeholders, as the leaders ultimately responsible for setting Republican policy, may lament the committee’s apparently veering onto their turf.

Passage of this resolution would please a vocal but shrinking faction of activists. However, committee members must be accountable to rank-and-file Republicans, among whom support for same-sex marriage has been consistently growing for as long as polling has been conducted on the subject. According to recent ABC News/Washington Post polling, 52 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents under the age of 50 support same-sex marriage. Among Republicans under 30, a majority also support same-sex marriage. Among evangelical Millennials, recent polling shows 64 percent support.

In New Hampshire, a majority of Republicans in the state’s General Court voted for same-sex marriage. Many tea-party Republicans disagree with the resolution’s stated support for the Defense of Marriage Act, which they consider to be unconstitutional because legislating on marriage is not within the purview of Congress’s enumerated powers. Should the RNC adopt this resolution, it will be pitting the most important of the GOP committees against all of these Republicans and conservatives.

As former RNC operatives, we firmly believe that passage of the resolution would be a significant setback in terms of party unity and branding, and would move the RNC further into a function that is outside its primary purpose: winning elections. Those voting on this resolution should reject it, and focus instead on reforms that will position the RNC to help deliver critical Republican wins in the 2014 midterms and in the 2016 presidential election. That is something we can all enthusiastically support.

— Liz Mair and Marco Nuñez are former Republican National Committee staffers and members of the Leadership Committee of the Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry.

Most Popular


Two Truth-Tellers, Brave as Hell

Yesterday, the Human Rights Foundation hosted an event they called “PutinCon” -- a conference devoted to the Russian “president,” Vladimir Putin: his rise and his deeds, both at home and abroad. Participating were both Russians and well-wishing foreigners. It was, above all, a day of truth-telling -- a ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Swamp: Navarro Nucor Edition

The Wall Street Journal has a story today about the ties between President Trump's trade adviser, Peter Navarro, and the biggest steel company in the U.S. -- Nucor Corp. It is particularly interesting in light of the stiff steel tariffs successfully pushed by Navarro, which he championed ever since he joined the ... Read More


EMPIRICAL   As I can fathom neither endlessness nor the miracle work of deities, I hypothesize, assume, and guess.   The fact that I love you and you love me is all I can prove and proves me. — This poem appears in the April 2 print issue of National Review. Read More
Politics & Policy

Rolling Back Dodd-Frank

The Senate on Wednesday passed a bill that would roll back parts of Dodd-Frank. The vote was 67–31, with 17 members of the Democratic caucus breaking party lines. If the legislation passes the House and is signed, it will be the largest change to the controversial financial-reform package since it became law in ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Samantha Power Regrets

‘I’ve had a lot of bad ideas in my life,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tells Politico. “Though none as immortalized as that one.” Wow. It’s a major concession. And what might “that one” be? Not standing idly by in the White House while Iranians protested a fixed election in 2009, then ... Read More