The Corner

Assessing the Modified DREAM Act

My concerns with the newly leaked alternative to the DREAM Act, which Katrina outlined below, is that it’s at once too restrictive and too expansive.

On the restrictive side, the proposal would limit the amnesty to those who earn a degree or serve in the military for four years. This means that someone who was brought here at three months old, has lived nowhere else, and knows no Spanish, but just isn’t bookish (or fit for the military) would be excluded. Since the humanitarian rationale for some version of the DREAM Act is that it would legalize those whose identities have been formed here and who are psychologically and emotionally Americans, this limitation seems to me inappropriate, even unjust.

Also under the “too restrictive” heading, the proposal gives only renewable work visas, rather than green cards. I know this is intended as a means of limiting chain migration, since people on “nonimmigrant” visas can’t sponsor people for immigration, but it’s a mistake for two reasons. The Democrats, with media complicity, will succeed in a few years in converting the temporary visas into green cards, so the whole “temporary” thing is just a legislative gimmick. And the reason they’ll succeed in such an effort with the public is that the original justification for the amnesty is that these young people are “Americans in all but paperwork,” so it follows that we should just give them permanent residence and be done with it.

But the Rubio draft is also too expansive in a number of ways. First, it sets the age of initial (illegal) entry to before the 15th birthday. That’s better than 16, as in the original DREAM Act, but since the rationale for the law is to legalize those who really have no memory of any other country, people who came as teenagers are simply not appropriate candidates for the amnesty. Lowering the age of initial entry to seven (the age of reason in canon and common law), or at least to ten, would be much more defensible.

Also, the proposal specifically excludes any enforcement measures, such as mandatory E-Verify. E-Verify hasn’t yet been phased in for all new hires, and any amnesty that doesn’t include measures to limit the opportunity for future amnesties is simply incomplete and an invitation to future illegal immigration.

What’s more, the Rubio proposal’s grant of renewable work visas merely delays the onset of chain migration as a result of the amnesty, rather than precludes it. Everyone understands that these young people are all going to get green cards in relatively short order, that the “temporary” nature of their visas is illusory. That’s why the family chain categories in the legal immigration system (i.e., all categories giving special immigration rights to relatives other than spouses and minor children) need to be eliminated altogether.

On balance, Rubio’s proposal is a good start, but still needs a lot of work.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Broward’s Cowards

It is impossible to imagine circumstances under which Broward County sheriff Scott Israel could attempt to perform his duties with the confidence of the public. He should resign immediately, and if, as he promises, he refuses to go quietly, then he should be shown the door by the people he professes to ... Read More

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

CNN’s Shameful Town Hall

CNN recently hosted an anti-gun town hall featuring a number of grieving children and parents from Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., who aimed their ire at the National Rifle Association, politicians peripherally associated with the NRA, and anyone who didn’t say exactly what they wanted to hear. ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More