The Corner

Autopilot Programs Will Squeeze Out Everything Else

You have heard it before, but it bears repeating: Even under very rosy assumptions, the growth of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and interest on the debt will squeeze out all other spending going forward. This week’s chart makes that point.

It looks at the projected composition of federal spending from 2010 to 2084 using data from the Congressional Budget Office’s most recent Long-Term Budget and Economic Outlook. The costs of the largest mandatory programs (Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid) and interest on the debt are plotted in blue; all other spending is shown in red. These components of federal spending matter not only because of their magnitude, but also because they are on autopilot. Unless lawmakers in Congress reform current laws, federal spending will continue to grow.

As a result of this automatic spending, we will face two major consequences: First, smaller portions of federal spending will be under lawmakers’ functional control. As we can see here, the proportion of federal spending under lawmakers’ control is projected to collapse over time. According to the CBO, this year, $0.48 of every dollar of federal spending will be devoted to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and net interest spending. By 2084, that will have risen to $0.90 of every dollar the federal government spends. This means that only $0.10 of every dollar of federal spending will be available to fund everything else.

Second, we will face gargantuan deficits into the foreseeable future; just because this chart fits in a neat rectangle, that doesn’t mean there will be money to pay for all this spending.

We should expect these two elements to have significant negative impact on economic growth. More government spending shrinks the private economy. Secondly, more spending and wider deficits will mean more borrowing and more debt. That in turn reduces the amount of savings devoted to productive capital and thus will result in lower incomes than would otherwise occur.

Higher debt also means higher interest payments. In theory, larger deficits simply require tax increases or spending cuts to make fiscal policy sustainable. However, our investors understand that these options are very unpopular and that instead lawmakers will likely revert to printing money. Hence, they are likely to ask for an inflation premium in the form of higher interest rates (probably on top of rate increases triggered by the fact that the more in debt we are, the closer we are to the point where our investors change their perceptions about our ability to pay them back). Higher rates will mean higher interest payments and slower economic growth, and higher debt and slower growth makes it harder for policymakers to respond to unexpected problems, such as financial crises, recessions, and wars.

All of which means that the reality will be much worse than this chart shows, since these projections assume that interest rates on the debt will remain low. Here are some projections of what interest rates could end up really looking like and what those rates would mean for federal spending and the deficit. For more on this issue, you should check this excellent piece by the editors of e21 called “The Next Entitlement Program: Interest on the Debt.”

Veronique de Rugy — Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More