The Corner

Bernanke Projects QE3 to Slow in the Fall, End in Summer of ’14, Market Disappointed

The Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee released its latest policy statement today, which announced no change in policy, pushing off for some time the possibility of “tapering,” i.e., the Fed’s slowing quantitative-easing program. The Fed will continue to purchase $40 billion worth of government-agency mortgage-backed securities each month and $45 billion worth of government debt each month, but at the press conference following the statement release, Bernanke offered a sketch of how, assuming the Fed’s current economic projections (which have improved a bit) come true, the program will be tapered and then halted.

Ceteris paribus, the purchases will “moderate,” i.e., slow, ”late this year” (2013); QE3 will end when unemployment reaches 7 percent, which they project will happen “around mid [2014]”; and then the Fed will begin to raise its interest rates from zero when unemployment hits 6.5 percent, which they expect around the beginning of 2015.

Markets don’t seem to be terribly pleased with the news, and certainly weren’t reassured: At closing today, the Dow had dropped 1.3 percent from the beginning of the day, off about 200 points.

But Bernanke was doing his best to assuage concerns about tightening, arguing, for instance, that the metrics he pointed to were “thresholds,” not “triggers,” meaning it would still be up to the Fed to keep policy loose after they’d happened — the words “at least as long as,” referring to the commitment not to raise rates until unemployment hits 6.5 percent, he called especially “important.” He also tried to underscore that the not-too-distant slowing of asset purchases wasn’t akin to actual shrinking of the monetary base, saying a smaller QE3 would be akin to a car that’s still accelerating, but the gas pedal has been eased, it wouldn’t mean “applying the brakes” yet.

After Bernanke so strongly emphasized the future policy implied by the Fed’s economic projections, Jon Hilsenrath of the Wall Street Journal pointed out one problem with the above schedule: The Fed’s economic projections have been notoriously optimistic in recent years. But Bernanke was happy to point out that, if the Fed’s projections were wrong, that would just mean more easing. Alas, all of this argument didn’t seem to calm equities markets, which dropped, or keep bond yields down (they jumped a little).

One of the few changes to the Fed’s statement was about inflation, which has continued to be low, and clearly lower than the Fed’s 2 percent target: In March, the committee said that inflation was “running somewhat below” the Fed’s objective due to energy prices; now it’s just running plain-old “below” the target, “partly reflecting transitory influences” (Bernanke named slower health-care inflation due to the sequester, interestingly). Two members of the twelve-member board dissented from the statement on inflation-related grounds: Governor George, as she has in the past, objected that asset purchases risked increasing inflation, while a new dissenter, Governor Bullard, argued that the Fed was now failing to keep inflation high enough “should signal more strongly its willingness to defend its inflation goal in light of recent low inflation readings.”

You can read the policy statement and see all the specific changes here with the Wall Street Journal’s statement tracker.

Patrick Brennan — Patrick Brennan is a writer and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C. He was Director of Digital Content for Marco Rubio's presidential campaign, writing op-eds, policy content, and leading the ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More