The Corner

Bioethicists Don’t Let People Vote Trump!

Bioethics may not have started out as a liberal political and social movement, but–like most of the humanities in academia–that is definitely what it has become.

Indeed, unless a “bioethicist” has a modifier like “Catholic” or “conservative” in front of the identifier, you can be almost certain that he or she is a cultural leftist, political progressive, almost surely Democrat (if not Green)–and highly secular.

Thus, mainstream bioethicists all support abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and the memes of “social justice.” Most endorse euthanasia/assisted suicide, single payer healthcare, and the need to expand access to radical reproductive technologies.

The field considers infanticide–sometimes called “after-birth abortion–and killing cognitively disabled patients for organs to be worthy of respectable debate. 

That is why an hysterical article in Bioethics Today by Wayne Shelton–Ph.D., don’t you know–is such a load of sewage.

Shelton apparently sees Trump as an apocalyptic threat to the democratic and moral order. I understand that he’s not alone.

But his argumentation is pure crapola. From, “A Concerning Time for America: No Time to be Politically Silent:”

The goal of ethical resolution in our democratic context is not to arrive at the ultimate, final, or “the” canonical ethical answer, but to reach a consensus between opposing moral perspectives that preserves a plurality of moral values based on well-established moral and legal democratic principles and values.

Thus, bioethics as a field that deals with living, practical ethical conflicts depends on a stable, democratic political system in which people with diverse values and beliefs can find non-violent, indeed peaceful means of finding resolutions to their moral differences. It is in this light that bioethicists should find very concerning what is happening in our presidential election cycle.

If bioethics is so dedicated to “diverse values and beliefs,” where are all the openly pro-life tenured professors teaching in major secular university bioethics centers? (Princeton’s Robby George doesn’t count, as he wasn’t tenured in bioethics.)

Indeed, if respect and engagement with morally diverse perspectives is so central to the field, why do pro-life university students who aspire to engage in the field tell me they feel the need to hide their true beliefs in order not to be discriminated against professionally?

Shelton declares–laughably–that it would be “unconstitutional” to deport 12 million illegal aliens and to bar Muslims from entering the country. (What does that have to do with bioethics?) No, it might be unwise policy, but that isn’t the same thing.

And he gives away the game by essentially acknowledging that his readers will all be of his political ilk:

Another part of the explanation also involves evolving cultural and religious norms over the past few decades governing same sex marriage, women’s roles and their reproductive rights, along with greater ethnic and religious inclusion and tolerance—changes that we liberals celebrate as progress and essential to a growing democracy—that are anathema to many on the political and cultural right.

Bioethicists support the creation of a technocratic society in which they–as the experts–ensure that the great unwashed increasingly lose sway. Thus, it is up to the bioethicists to save the republic!

I conclude that this political season is not a normal cycle in the American democratic experiment. It is not a time for thoughtful people and thought-leaders like bioethicists, to remain silent. We must speak out individually and make ourselves heard.

Pomposity leaders, more like it.

When it comes to bioethics, it is usually wise to follow Seinfield’s old George Costanza rule: Do the opposite of what they advocate as the best way to successfully maintain a moral and truly diverse society.

Wesley J. Smith — Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More