The Corner

Botched Abortion Commentary

Eugene Robinson writes,

The GOP strategy is to go after the less popular elements of the reform package. These include a requirement that businesses do a lot more paperwork for the IRS, a measure allowing federal money to pay for abortions in the case of rape or incest, and the mandate compelling individuals to buy health insurance. “We will look at these individual pieces to see if we can’t have the thing crumble,” Upton said (emphasis added).

Robinson is quoting new House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Fred Upton, who spoke with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday. In the sentence immediately before the quoted one, Upton says that what he wants is to enact “the Stupak language.” That’s a clear reference to the Stupak-Pitts amendment to the House health-care bill, which passed on a big bipartisan vote but did not make it through the Senate. That amendment would have allowed funding in cases of rape, incest, and threats to the life of the mother. It would have blocked funding for other abortions.

Upton has elsewhere endorsed two pieces of legislation restricting abortion funding. Both of those bills allow funding in cases of rape, incest, and threats to the life of the mother. Robinson is just wrong here. And his misunderstanding is reflected in his conclusion that the health-care law’s abortion provisions are “fully in keeping with. . . public opinion” and that Democrats should be glad to have a fight over them.

P.S. Robinson assails the Republicans for holding a vote on repeal of Obamacare when they know their bill cannot pass the Senate or be signed by the president. “So this exercise in tilting at windmills can’t even be described as quixotic, since that would imply some expectation of success, however delusional.” Did Robinson make the same complaint when House Democrats voted on S-Chip expansion and embryonic stem-cell funding during the Bush administration? Everyone knew those bills, and many others, weren’t going to become law until we had a new president.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More