The Corner

Burma? Myanmar?

Burma. Per the Huffington Post:

President Barack Obama used that name during his historic visit Monday, but he also called Burma what its government and many other people have been calling it for years: Myanmar.

Obama’s use of that single word was warmly welcomed by top government officials here, who immediately imbued it with significance.

Myanmar presidential adviser Ko Ko Hlaing called the wording “very positive” and said it was an “acknowledgement of Myanmar’s government,” which has taken major steps toward easing repression and transitioning to democratic rule since the military stepped aside last year.

Speaking aboard Air Force One after Obama’s departure, U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said the presidential phrasing was “a diplomatic courtesy” for Myanmar’s reformist President Thein Sein.

“It doesn’t change the fact that the United States government position is still Burma,” he said. “But we’ve said we recognize that different people call this country by different names. Our view is that is something we can continue to discuss.”

It is true that “different people call this country by different names.” It’s also irrelevant. If “Burma” is good enough for every single pro-democracy type, it should be good enough for the president of the United States. 

The issue is so sensitive that Obama’s aides had said earlier Monday he would likely avoid mentioning either politically charged name. But he used both during his six-hour trip – “Myanmar” during morning talks with Thein Sein, “Burma” afterward while visiting with opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Ah, I see. So Obama is Janus. This is a little like, say, posturing as if you support the protesters in Iran, but then referring to the country as the “Islamic Republic of Iran,” dropping all mention of “regime change,” and promising to “extend a hand” to the dictatorship. Or perhaps it’s like referring to the Falklands as “the Falklands” when discussing the matter with the British, but trying to call the islands the “Malvinas” when in Colombia. Again, if “Burma” is good enough for Aung San Suu Kyi, then it’s good enough for Thein Sein. And if the “United States government position is still Burma,” then it can refer to it as such.

How would the United States have liked it if the British government had acknowledged the Confederacy when talking to representatives from seceded states, but affirmed the indivisibility of the Union when talking to William Seward? Or if the French had referred to “British colonies” when addressing King George, but the “United States” when addressing Jefferson and Adams? My guess is that it would have been livid. And correctly so; there is no room for Erwin Schrödinger in American foreign policy.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More