Economy & Business

The Corner

The CBO Scores Trump’s Budget

You can read the score here. The bottom line is that Trump’s budget would slash spending more than it cut revenues, reducing the deficit by about a third relative to current law during the 2018–2027 window.

That’s great, but bear in mind two things: (a) The gains are from spending cuts that will be difficult to pass, as we’re already seeing in the effort to repeal and replace Obamacare; (b) the score basically ignores the entire issue of tax reform, which could be a big budget-buster.

(As the report puts it, the budget’s tax reforms “lacked the specificity necessary to evaluate any effects,” so they “used as a placeholder the Administration’s estimate that the proposal would have no net budgetary effect.” That’s a prediction I will take seriously when outside organizations have confirmed it, for obvious reasons.)

Here are some of the major numbers, all referring to the ten-year budget window. Overall revenues would fall nearly $900 billion while outlays fell $4.2 trillion, for a net deficit reduction of $3.3 trillion. As of 2027, debt would be 80 percent of GDP, just a few points higher than it is today, instead of 91 percent, as under current law.

These estimates do not include the effects the budget would have on economic growth; they’d be slightly better, the CBO says, if they did. The Trump administration, by contrast, thinks the economic benefits of the plan would be so yuge they’d eliminate the entire deficit.

About $900 billion of the budget’s deficit reduction is from health-care reform (eliminating $1 trillion in Obamacare revenue but reducing federal spending on health care even more). Other major contributors are $240 billion in cuts to “income security” programs (primarily food stamps), $100 billion in cuts to student loans (which would be replaced by loans that are paid back based on the student’s income and forgiven after a set time), $750 billion in cuts to “overseas contingency operations” in “Afghanistan and elsewhere” (partly offset by $450 billion in other defense spending), and $1.5 trillion in cuts to “other nondefense” discretionary funding (such as agency budgets).

One final interesting tidbit: Though the budget pretends to boost infrastructure spending $200 billion, “The President’s proposals for discretionary spending would reduce appropriations for other accounts that provide funding for infrastructure, such as those for ground transportation and water resources. Those reductions would largely offset the proposed increase.”


Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More