The Corner


I do love this email, as it is a pristine example of an entire type. The reader begins insisting that I’m too stupid and immature for one so lofty to take seriously. He then proceeds to take me seriously, usually unimpressively, then he ends by invoking William F. Buckley (or Goldwater) as the sort of “real” conservative who would/should have nothing to do with my ilk. I get lots of these. Anyway, here’s the email:

Dear Mr. Goldberg,

In general, I make it a point to avoid responding to

your posts, usually because the lack of moral seriousness, the unbearable,

juvenile glibness of the child of privilege that you are — these qualities,

which so thoroughly inundate your postings, are typically enough to make me

despair of ever engaging you in thoughtful discussion that might — just

might — take you out of your role as house intellectual/Simpsons

quote-monger in the NRO-Fox-WH news alliance.

But this nonsense about Pinochet vs. Castro is really too much. Why

can’t decent people of goodwill agree that both dictators were and are

reprehensible? And while it is noted that you yourself make a weak attempt

to tackle the hypocrisy from Left and Right on this issue, you neglect the

fact that with the murderous Pinochet, we (the U.S.) provided him with

material aid and supported him to the hilt. Surely you agree that we must

answer for that? Surely, with Jefferson, you tremble for your country when

you reflect that God is just? No, wait — I forgot that any sense of justice

has fallen by the wayside in your depraved, Pravda-esque contortions of

morality and reason that have become necessary to defend not only Bush, but

also the larger Rightist project for which you so passionately advocate. For

extraordinary rendition and waterboarding. To expect the same man who

supports torture and the abrogation of every value for which this nation

stands to look with genuine disgust and horror on American culpability for

anything, much less our support for that two-bit thug Pinochet, is to expect

you to go so far out of character as to defy identity. For that reason, I

suppose I ought to have expected your exceptionally mealy-mouthed defense of

dictators of the Right and your outrage — outrage! — at dictators of the


As for me, I am no ANSWER/Chomsky type, but rather a straight-up liberal

in the tradition of John Rawls; I think that killing Castro might have been

a good thing to do, as it would have been with Pinochet. It’s just

illuminating to see the excuses you (and the late Amb. Kirkpatrick) for

mass-murderers when they’re on the “right” side.

I wonder what Bill Buckley thinks.

Me: There’s is way too much tendentious and self-righteous preaching here to get into and he so wildly misreads my post and is flat-out ignorant — or dishonest — about my larger positions (hardly shocking given the low esteem he holds me in). But, just for the record, I sincerely doubt there’s a lot of daylight between WFB and myself when it comes to Pinochet — or Castro.

Update: From a reader:

Just refreshed the corner while finishing my lunch.  So now its your fault that the US supported Pinochet and didnt deal with him?  Wasnt this the same crowd yelling at us when we wanted to invade Iraq for WMDs since we had given them to Saddam in the past?  So if I understand the position, the US cant help anyone who turns out to be less than stellar, since we will have to castigate ourselves for not doing anything, but make sure not to do anything.  Yikes. 

By the way, I think house intellectual/Simpsons quote-monger was supposed to be an insult, but that is greatest compliment of all time.  Maybe you should get that put on your business cards.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More