A Column about Nothing

I’m struggling to see the point of Linda Greenhouse’s column over the weekend on “The Roberts Court, Version 4.0.” The factoid it’s built on: “Turnover on the Supreme Court has been unusually fast since John G. Roberts Jr. became chief justice five years ago, ending a period of 11 years with no change at all.” The alleged significance of the factoid: “As the court’s personnel shifts, so does its collective personality, inevitably but not necessarily predictably.”

And then we lose the thread. Maybe there have been “four Roberts Courts” in some sense beyond the trivial one that there have been four different line-ups on the Court. But Greenhouse doesn’t come close to establishing that there have been. As far as one can tell from reading the column, there have actually been two Roberts Courts: one with O’Connor and one with Alito. Which everyone already knew.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More