The Corner

Conservatives and Charity

Most of the media coverage of Romney’s 2011 tax returns has revolved around the percentage he paid in federal taxes. That number is 14.1 and would have been as low as 10.4 had he deducted the full amount of his charitable giving. Isolated, those two figures support the Warren Buffet rhetoric about tax rates: Why should they be lower for the super rich than for their secretaries?

But Romney gave 29 percent of his income to charity and, hence, 43 percent to charity and taxes combined. And, of course, many liberals object to that conflation of the two forms of disbursement. Charity, as they see it, is a nice garnish, or maybe dessert, but no substitute for taxes, the meat and potatoes of our state-sponsored great society, which all of us have a moral obligation to support, each according to his ability.

Taxes, though, are no substitute for supporting your church, your alma mater, the local JCC, Meals on Wheels, or what have you. Mediating institutions that provide social services (as well as intangibles, including the experience of belonging) would grow and, you would think, reduce the need for government entitlements if taxpayers had more after-tax income to invest in privately sponsored safety nets and other social goods that they believed in.

Taxes and charity serve some important common purposes and should be complementary. You’ll think that charity should be subordinated to taxes only if you believe that the state should be the primary provider of social goods. If you believe it should be the provider of last resort, you’ll want to lower taxes so that the people most likely to give will have more to give. Arthur Brooks wrote the book on conservatives and charity: Who Really Cares.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More