The Corner

Corey Stewart Smears Ed Gillespie

“I just am having a hard time understanding how Ed Gillespie can call himself a conservative, how he can call himself a Catholic, how he can call himself frankly even a good man.” What elicited this outburst from Corey Stewart?

Gillespie and Stewart are both running for the Republican nomination for governor of Virginia. (Gillespie, I should note, has been a speaker on NR cruises.) In a statement earlier this week, Gillespie said, “As governor I would support and sign pain-capable legislation to ban late-term abortions after an unborn child can feel pain, with exceptions for cases involving the life of the mother, rape or incest. Protecting innocent human life is a central function of our government.” For Stewart, that makes Gillespie “someone who is for late-term abortion.” Stewart even calls for Gillespie to get out of the race.

Stewart says, “There should be no exceptions.” It is certainly within Stewart’s rights to criticize Gillespie for supporting exceptions for cases involving the life of the mother, rape, or incest—although a debate between pro-lifers about these exceptional cases, on the eve of the March for Life, does not seem likely to do much to advance the broader cause of protecting the lives of unborn human beings. But Stewart doesn’t even mention the words “rape,” “incest,” or “life of the mother” in his video attack, so intent is he on presenting Gillespie as a supporter of late-term abortion.

I have known Gillespie for more than twenty years, and he has always been pro-life. That’s why the National Right to Life Committee endorsed him in his 2014 race for the Senate. It’s one of the reasons David LaRock, the Virginia delegate who is the lead sponsor of legislation to ban late-term abortion (without rape and incest exceptions) in the commonwealth, is supporting Gillespie now. And it’s why Stewart’s attack is being described as “classless” and “disgraceful.” It is those things. It is also a lie.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More