Politics & Policy

The Corner

Could Anyone Have Fired Comey without Provoking a Storm?

In our current environment, I think the answer is “no.” Imagine that Hillary Clinton had won the White House in November, and that she’d canned Comey at some point in her first year. Wouldn’t the Right have exploded in exactly the same way as has the Left? Fox News is already selling Trump’s decision as the overture to a potential prosecution of Clinton. Imagine what it would be saying if she were president.

Insofar as it helps us ask the right questions and get closer to the truth, the timing of Trump’s decision matters. But I’m not sure it has made a big difference to the rhetoric we’re seeing. If President Clinton had taken the decision to get rid of Comey on her first day, she would likely have been accused of vindictiveness or of self-protection. Had she done it 100 days in, she’d have been accused of removing the man who was “getting too close.” Whatever she did, she wouldn’t have been able to win. 

The same, I’d venture, applies to Barack Obama. Many on both the Left and the Right called for Comey’s head last year. But what would have been the reaction if Obama had actually done it? Wouldn’t he have been accused of “protecting” Hillary and his party? Of taking “revenge”? Of a “cover up”? I rather think he would. 

Now, none of this is to say that we shouldn’t be alarmed by Trump’s timing, to imply that he’s in the same position as would Obama and Clinton have been, or to propose that we shouldn’t demand a congressional investigation. We should, he’s not, and we should. Rather it is to suggest that our partisanship has become so pronounced that one can see a sharp case being made against any president who had followed this course. Indeed, it is not too difficult conceive of a similar case against any president who chose not to fire Comey. “He needs to keep him close,” the theorists would have said. Or: “He had to keep Comey there so he didn’t talk.” Or: “By not firing Comey, Obama/Clinton/Trump has kept new blood out of the FBI and ensured that a compromised figure will oversee the investigation.”

What a sad state of affairs.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More