The Corner

DADT Report Reactions

The Pentagon released the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell report this afternoon. And while the report is being spun as evidence that permitting openly homosexual men and women to serve in the military wouldn’t impact effectiveness or morale, not everyone agrees — or thinks that the report shows that to be the case.

“They never asked the question whether the law should be retained or repealed,” says Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness. “They framed these questions in the way that support for the current law was not even allowed to be said.”

Donnelly also pointed to the fact that among Army and Marine combat troops, nearly 50 and 60 percent respectively thought that working with an openly gay or lesbian service member would have a negative or very negative effect on their unit’s ability to work together and trust one another.

Those concerns were echoed by a National Guard sergeant, who asked to remain anonymous. “Most of the Army is dedicated to paper-pushing,” he wrote. “Only about 10 percent of our Active troops are combat-arms troops like myself. Having a gay soldier work with you in an office environment? Sure, why not? It’s similar to any other office environment in the world.  Having a gay soldier driving your gun truck in the middle of Afghanistan? Ehhhh, maybe not so cool.”

The sergeant also noted that he had chosen not to respond to the survey because the military had ignored soldiers’ opinions in the past. “The Pentagon brass has pushed women in combat, in violation of federal law, has put women on submarines and combat vessels, and done lots of other things that the troops didn’t care for,” he wrote. “Why would they listen to us this time? Plus, I’d really rather not have a black mark on my digital record out there that says ‘distrusts gay servicemembers — possible homophobe/bigot.’”

Kieran Michael Lalor, the founder of Iraq Veterans for Congress, criticized the report for asking the wrong question, saying “the question is does it [ending DADT] help?”

“Why are we working on this social experiment in the military? Why are those resources being committed to this? What is the benefit?” Lalor says, arguing that the Pentagon should direct this energy to finding new ways to reduce casualties.

Lalor also argues that the report’s finding that 92 percent of service members who had worked with a suspected homosexual co-worker described the experience as very good, good or neither good nor poor is justification of DADT. “Under the current policy, yeah, we had homosexuals serving with us and it wasn’t a problem. That’s a validation of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

Donnelly’s conclusion is that the report doesn’t bolster proponents of ending DADT. “There is nothing in this report that says anything beneficial would come from repeal of the law,” she says. “So where’s the trade off? If there is a risk of any size, where is the benefit that justifies that risk? We have here the two top leaders saying a risk should be justified. Because the president made a political promise. That’s it. That’s not a good enough reason.”

“I think they’re taking advantage of our military’s can do attitude,” says Lalor. “No matter what comes down the road, we’ll be able to accomplish the mission. Of course they [service members] can. That’s to our credit. That doesn’t mean it’s making their jobs any easier.”

Katrina Trinko — Katrina Trinko is a political reporter for National Review. Trinko is also a member of USA TODAY’S Board of Contributors, and her work has been published in various media outlets ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More