From a reader:
Here’s how to understand Dawkins:
(1) If there’s a trait, behavior, or (eye-roll) “meme” that Dawkins likes, it’s the product of evolution and therefore good.
(2) If it’s something that he doesn’t like, well then it’s just a vestage of blind, dumb evolution that we can discard now that we’re more enlightened.
Anyway, it’s always fun to see determinists attempt to derive “ought” from “is.”