The Corner

Deal or No Deal?

That is the question on everyone’s mind today on Capitol Hill. Staff negotiators worked until 3 a.m. and appear to have made progress, but nobody wants to be the first to blink. Harry Reid says: “This all deals with ‘women’s health.’ Everything has been resolved. Everything,” presumably referring to provisions that would deny federal funding for Planned Parenthood. However, GOP aides insist that “spending” remains the largest unresolved issue. Lawmakers from both parties are storming the airwaves this morning, basically to lay the groundwork for blaming the other side for a government shutdown, which is what will happen if they don’t pass some kind of funding resolution by midnight tonight. Speaker Boehner will likely try to sell a compromise to House Republicans when they meet today at noon. He would like to pass a bill without the help Democratic votes, which would mean limiting GOP defections to about 30. Stay tuned, as the situation should develop rapidly, and could go all the way down to the wire.

UPDATE (10:39 a.m.): Reid tells reporters that Democrats have agreed to $38 billion in spending cuts, abortion funding still the only area of disagreement. Senate Democrats plan to introduce their own short-term resolution that would fund the military in the event of a shutdown, and President Obama has canceled a trip to Indiana in light of the ongoing negotiations.

UPDATE (10:58 a.m.): Boehner gave a very brief statement to reporters just now. He said “there is only one reason” why there is no deal and that is spending. “The American people deserve to know: When will the White House and Senate Democrats get serious about cutting spending?” The Speaker called on Harry Reid to pass the House-passed “troop funding bill” and called on President Obama to sign it into law (he had threatened a veto).

UPDATE (11:10 a.m.): Speaking on the Senate floor, Reid said he was “very hopeful” that an agreement can be reached today, announcing a special Democratic caucus meeting at 1:00 p.m.. He then went off on a ridiculous diatribe about how Republicans “want to shut the government down because they think there’s nothing more important than denying women cancer screenings,” claiming the disagreement had “nothing to do with abortion.” (!)

“They want me to sarifice my wife’s health, my daughter’s health and my nine granddaughters’ health,” he said. “As a father, a husband and a grandfather I am personally offended.”

Sen. Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.) offered a swift rebuttal: “You don’t have to go to Planned Parenthood to get your blood pressure or cholesterol checked,” he said. “If you want an abortion, you go to Planned Parenthood. That’s 90 percent of what they do.”

Kyl urged lawmakers to “stop throwing rotten apples at each other.”

Andrew Stiles — Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online. He previously worked at the Washington Free Beacon, and was an intern at The Hill newspaper. Stiles is a 2009 ...

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More