The Corner

Democrats Embarrassed by Campaign Tricks

From New Jersey to Pennsylvania to Nevada, Democrats have placed fake Tea Party candidates on the ballot in order to split the Republican vote. In many of these races, the Tea Party candidate’s percentage in the polls exceeds the margin between the Republican and Democratic candidates.

Just last week, the Democratic congressional candidate in the Pennsylvania 7th, Bryan Lentz, finally admitted to the Delaware County Daily Times editorial board that without his help, independent candidate Jim Schneller would not have gotten on the ballot. In a debate this summer, Lentz denied having anything to do with Schneller’s appearing on the ballot, and in August, Schneller told PoliticsPA that the rumors that Lentz had gotten him on the ballot were simply an attempt to discredit his candidacy.

The Philadelphia Daily News called a mid-October campaign debate between Lentz and Schneller “farcical.” The charade had Bryan Lentz and the candidate that Lentz got on the ballot, Schneller, both attacking the Republican nominee, Patrick Meehan. Meehan didn’t think such a debate was fair and refused to participate; Lentz attacked Meehan as afraid to “face the voters.”

Schneller is only polling at 1 or 2 percent, but the latest poll of the race by Franklin & Marshall (10/5–10/11) gives Meehan just a three-point lead over Lentz. A slightly earlier poll by The Hill gave Meehan only a one-point lead. Lentz’s shenanigans could well determine the outcome of this race.

Part of Lentz’s defense: “I think that it is important to make the distinction that there are places in the country this year where Democrats had a cup of coffee with someone and said, ‘Why don’t you put your name on the ballot?’ That is absolutely not the situation here.” No, in this case Lentz’s staff helped Schneller collect signatures to qualify for the ballot.

Meanwhile, in Florida, the Orlando Sentinel has reported on links between the Florida Tea Party and inflammatory congressman Alan Grayson (D., Fla.). Among the ties: Doug Guetzloe, a Florida Tea Party co-founder, served on an advisory panel for Grayson, and Guetzloe’s son interned for him.

New Jersey’s Courier Post ran a headline announcing that “Dems picked spoiler candidate.” With internal polls showing freshman Rep. John Adler losing to possible Republican challengers by about five points, Democrats apparently “recruited [Peter DeStefano, a picture framer from Mount Laurel] to run as a third-party candidate.”

In Nevada, the Real Clear Politics average of surveys showed Republican Sharron Angle leading Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid by only 1.8 percentage points as of Thursday morning. But Scott Ashjian, the U.S. Senate Tea Party candidate, was getting 7 percent of likely voters according to an October CNN/Opinion Research poll.

Cleta Mitchell, a prominent Washington GOP lawyer who is working for Angle’s campaign, has stated that Ashjian’s presence on the ballot is “costing Sharron the election.” Ashjian had no history of involvement in the Tea Party movement before placing his name on the ballot. As Mark Williams, the chairman of the Tea Party Express, noted in one ad, “None of us has ever heard of you.”

Some other attempts by Democrats to place fake Tea Party candidates on the ballot have failed. But the secrecy of these efforts clearly shows that Democrats find their actions embarrassing. The national media has ignored these frauds. If Harry Reid or some of these other candidates squeak through to victory on November 2, questions of their legitimacy will last.

John R. Lott Jr. is a contributor, an economist, and author of the recently revised third edition of More Guns, Less Crime.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More