From a reader:

Dear Mr. Goldberg,

In your Dec. 30 column you mentioned the BBC’s directive not to call Saddam Hussein a “dictator.” An amusing contrast is their readiness to use that term with others such as Augusto Pinochet. Here are a few examples that Google turned up:




The last link is a brief history of Chile which has a “Pinochet dictatorship” section. I was curious whether they used “dictator” in other country profiles. Not for Iraq. In Cuba’s they do, but not for Castro, only for one of his predecessors.

I think it’s perfectly accurate to call both Hussein and Pinochet dictators. However, if one was requiring strict criteria for using this subjective characterization, Pinochet would much less qualify as a dictator than Hussein, e.g., level of dissent allowed, domestic body count, and the degree which others in his junta limited his one-man rule.

Most Popular


Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More