Do They Really Believe This Nonsense?

Many years ago — early in my litigation career against campus censorship and repression — I challenged in court a policy that confidently declared, “Acts of intolerance will not be tolerated.”

Think about that sentence for a moment — would the university violate its own policy against intolerance by not tolerating intolerance, and then be forced to punish itself? At any rate, a federal judge struck it down, and that particular phrase of repressive college doublespeak started to disappear into the memory hole.

The impulse to cloak censorship and repression in high-minded nonsense remains, however. Yesterday the New York Times covered the plight of Christian groups on campus, where groups at dozens of universities — including in the California State University System, the nation’s largest — face exclusion from campus because they refuse to submit to demands that they not use their religious faith when determining the leaders of religious groups. As if it should be irrelevant whether a Christian bible study leader is actually Christian. Justified as a diversity initiative, it is motivated by nothing but malice — the desire to force Christian groups into a corner so that they either leave (the preferred outcome), water down their faith to accommodate university-approved ideologies (a decent second-best alternative), or lie about their policies and actions (an immoral response that also leaves the groups vulnerable to school discipline).

But universities can’t tell the truth about this hostility, so they make utterly nonsensical statements like this, from Cal State’s lawyer, “Our mission is education, not exclusivity.”

What does this even mean? Cal State’s policy is fundamentally and intentionally exclusive, motivated by “education” only to the extent that it educates its students that there’s something wrong with faithful Christian students, that the exercise of their faith is harmful to the campus. In other words, exclusion is the point of Cal State’s “education.”

And students learn this lesson well. Do you wonder why so many of our citizens are convinced that you shouldn’t even hold a job unless you have the proper views on the sexual revolution? Look no further than your local campus, where intellectually bankrupt ideologues have spoken, loudly and clearly: Acts of intolerance will not be tolerated, and the “exclusive” shall be excluded.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More